Showing posts with label Palin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Palin. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

She's Back!

We missed Sarah Palin’s visit to Greenville last week. Apparently she missed us too, so she’s coming back to North Carolina.

Palin will make a campaign stop for a rally in Elon.

Sarah Palin, the Republican vice presidential candidate, will hold a rally Thursday at Elon University.

The rally will include music by country star hank Williams Jr. The event will be held at Latham Park, the university's baseball stadium.

Doors open at noon. The event is free but tickets are required.

Tickets are available at GOP Victory offices beginning today at noon. Looks like we have lunch plans today!

Elon is just up the road from here, much closer than Greenville. Thank you, Sarah. See you in a couple of days. You too, Hank.

Hopefully we'll be able to snap a few pics and maybe get some video to post here late Thursday or Friday. Stay tuned!


HEARTBREAK: We won’t be able to attend after all. We think we might cry. Sorry, Sarah.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Team McCain's Magic Quadrant

Earlier we had a post showing Team Obama's Magic Quadrant Breakdown of Election 2008.

Now for the Magic Quadrant of the election as seen by the Republicans. The GOP uses the traditional Magic Quadrant definitions for each axis, Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision, with the overall measure being who can bring reform to Washington (original Magic Quadrants were developed by research and consulting firm Gartner).

In choosing Sarah Palin, John McCain has made clear that his overarching theme is one of government reform, trying to steal the rug out from under Obama on "change".

Who has brought about reform in government? Who has worked in bi-partisan ways to bring change? Who has bucked their own party to get things done?

For our purposes here, we will focus on the least known of the candidates, letting Beldar present the case for Palin as an accomplished reformer.



Saturday, October 4, 2008

Palin-Biden debate, more than words

Well, here we go.

According to CNN, Sarah Palin spoke at a higher grade level than Joe Biden.

(CNN) -- An analysis carried out by a language monitoring service said Friday that Gov. Sarah Palin spoke at a more than ninth-grade level and Sen. Joseph Biden spoke at a nearly eighth-grade level in Thursday night's debate between the vice presidential candidates. ...

Grade level: Biden, 7.8; Palin, 9.5 (Newspapers are typically written to a sixth-grade reading level.)

Sentences per paragraph: statistically tied at 2.7 for Biden and 2.6 for Palin.

Letters per word: tied at 4.4.

Ease of reading: Biden, 66.7 (with 100 being the easiest to read or hear), versus 62.4 for Palin.

Perhaps most intriguing, our word count differs markedly from that in the article -- and contra our count has Biden out-wording Palin.

Baffling.

And while we are most certainly not a global language monitoring service expert, Google Docs does provide some Grammar Tools. Based upon the transcript we have used, here's what it has to say:

Biden:
Flesch Reading Ease: 74.43
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 6.00

Palin:
Flesch Reading Ease: 69.65
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 7.00

Matches up at least fairly well with the global language monitoring service expert.

And from wikipedia, a little background on the Flesch Reading Ease score and the Flesch-Kincaid Gradel Level score:

The Flesch/Flesch–Kincaid Readability Tests are readability tests designed to indicate comprehension difficulty when reading a passage of contemporary academic English. There are two tests, the Flesch Reading Ease, and the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level. Although they use the same core measures (word length and sentence length), they have different weighting factors, so the results of the two tests correlate imperfectly: a text with a higher score on the Reading Ease test over another text may have a lower score on the Grade Level test. Both systems were devised by Rudolf Flesch.

In the Flesch Reading Ease test, higher scores indicate material that is easier to read; lower numbers mark more-difficult-to-read passages.

The "Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level Formula" translates the 0–100 score to a U.S. grade level, making it easier for teachers, parents, librarians, and others to judge the readability level of various books and texts.

We have no idea how much a global language monitoring service charges someone like CNN to perform their service -- but we would have done it for much cheaper.

But then again, if we got the word count wrong (and we have no reason to think the global language monitoring service expert is wrong, and the error could have been ours or the transcript from which we were working), then perhaps CNN spent the money wisely.

[VIMH: Are you going to go back and check your word count?]
It is under consideration.

UPDATE: We went back and did a recount. There were some dimpled chads, including one section that was clearly Biden speaking, though labeled as Palin. New totals...

Palin: 7520 (vs 7734 in first count)
Biden: 7183 (vs 7419 in the first count)

What accounts for the difference other than the misattribution? Well, the transcript has been updated, with a few notes in the current version. We have no idea what changed and how that may or may not have affected the counts.

As to the word counts in the CNN article, which not only indicate that Biden spoke more words than Palin, but also indicates a couple thousand fewer words by each candidate, we have no idea what the difference is. Perhaps they didn't count opening and closing statements?

It will continue as a mystery...

Your best bet, though, will probably be to trust the global language monitoring expert. He doesn't get paid the big bucks for nothing.

Friday, October 3, 2008

Palin-Biden debate, just words

Here are some stats and graphics from tonight's VP debate between Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, using this transcript.

First, how many words did each candidate speak in the debate?

  • Sara Palin: 7,734
  • Joe Biden: 7,419

  • (UPDATE: see updated numbers in this post)

    We won't pretend we aren't surprised that Sarah Palin got more words in than Joe Biden. We wish we had placed a very large bet in Vegas on this, surely those would have been very, very good odds.

    Second, here are word clouds created from the transcript for each candidate.

    Biden:

    Biden VP Debate Word Cloud

    Palin:

    Palin VP Debate Word Cloud

    (click images to enlarge)

    UPDATE: OK, yeah, she asked for it...how many words did Gwen Ifill speak in the debate?

  • Gwen Ifil: 1,734

    And the word cloud?

    Ifill:

    Gwen Ifill VP Debate Word Cloud

    All word clouds created with Wordle

  • Thursday, October 2, 2008

    We’ve got good news and bad news

    The bad news? The once safe status of North Carolina for McCain-Palin is now out the window. It’s a battleground state, with state polls heading in Obama’s favor in the last few weeks.

    The good news? That means Sarah Palin gets dispatched to our state. And here to Greensboro!

    GREENSBORO -- Vice presidential nominee Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin will attend a fundraiser event on Oct. 16 in Greensboro, according to Joe Hauck at the New Breed Company in Greensboro.

    The bad news? The fundraiser is probably not open to the public.

    The event, which most likely won't be open to the public, will be held at the home of Louis DeJoy, president of Greensboro logistics company New Breed, the News and Record reported. DeJoy is the state finance chair for the McCain/Palin ticket.

    The good news? She’s coming back to the state for a rally!

    Palin is also scheduled to make another swing through the Tarheel state leading up to Election Day in November.

    The bad news? The rally is at Eastern Carolina University, in Greenville, three hours away in the middle of the week.

    She will be attending a rally on the campus of East Carolina on Tuesday, McCain campaign officials confirmed.

    The good news?

    ...

    Well, we'll try and come up with something.

    To be able to skip work and make the rally!

    Monday, September 22, 2008

    Moving toward a post-racial view of the election?

    From Ed Lasky at American Thinker, we have some really amazing breaking news from the campaign:

    "Obama's name and his African heritage are obstacles to the party's chances of capturing the White House, party activists are finding," Dave Davies reports in the Philadelphia Daily News. "I'm hearing a lot of people saying, 'He's too young, he's too inexperienced,' " said Philadelphia AFL-CIO President Pat Eiding. "What they're really saying is, 'He's black.'

    Taking a look back at our depiction of Team Obama's Magic Quadrant Breakdown of Election 2008, we are reminded that Palin and Obama share the same lower left quadrant on the measures of age and experience. Our point was that Team Obama uses different descriptors of that quadrant...for Obama it is “Untainted and Vigorous Agent of Change and Deliverer of Hope”. For Palin, it is “Lightweight Neophyte”.

    But now, if young and inexperienced really means black...well...

    You know what it means when this is Team Obama’s first reaction to Sarah Palin’s selection:

    Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency.

    What Team Obama Is Really Saying Is, ‘Sarah Palin Is Black’.

    Not only that, but 'Palin' is a funny name, and she certainly doesn’t look like the other Presidents on the dollar bills.

    Friday, September 19, 2008

    "Pray for our military men and women"

    Bill Clinton, FDR, John F. Kennedy, Abraham Lincoln *AND* Sarah Palin

    vs.

    Charlie "Are we fighting a holy war?" Gibson


    (h/t JPod, who h/t's Ace, who h/t's Instapundit)

    Thursday, September 18, 2008

    Just like me

    John McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin to be his vice presidential running mate has created a new dynamic in this year’s presidential election. For months, pundits and experts (not always the same thing) have been telling us that the election came down to a referendum on Barack Obama. Because of the fatigue felt toward President Bush in the waning days of his administration, voters are ready enough for change to vote for just about any Democrat – all Obama has to do was pass some minimal bar of acceptability to prove he would be capable at the helm.

    It would be McCain’s job, not so much to prove himself capable, for few people would deny that his experience and history have prepared him for such a role, but to work to convince voters that Barack Obama was not ready and not right for this nation, especially at this time.

    While that dynamic still exists – of course Obama will not be elected president if he does not pass the capability test – the importance of it is now being challenged due to the excitement surrounding Sarah Palin’s inclusion on the GOP ticket. Sarah Palin is the new rock star, the hot celebrity, the hip and happening center of gravity now in the campaign.

    The excitement and deep emotions cut both ways, of course. As excited as Republicans and conservatives are, Democrats and liberals are shaken and dismayed. For every campaign stop with thousands of screaming and adoring supporters chanting “Sa-rah Sa-rah”, there are elite media personalities and Democratic operatives and even Obama campaign representatives willing to drag Sarah Palin through the gutter of rumors and smears and whispers and lies. As is true almost any time cable news becomes must-see-TV, the results are largely cringe-inducing.

    This new stage in the campaign is all about who Sarah Palin is, what she represents, and how people react to someone so completely unlike the politicians we expect to run on a national ticket in an election for the highest office in the country.

    Sarah Palin has never been exposed to the national media, and perhaps more importantly the national media has never been exposed to Sarah Palin or anyone like her as a nominee in a presidential campaign. Palin doesn’t run in the elite media cocktail circuit and shows no interest in doing so. Palin took direct aim at the media in her acceptance speech when she said,

    I've learned quickly these last few days that, if you're not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone.

    But -- now, here's a little newsflash. Here's a little newsflash for those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion. I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this great country.

    Sarah Palin creates an antipathy in the elite media. She is ambitious, but to get things done rather than to be well-known or to be well-liked. And while the elite media sees themselves as the gatekeepers of information to be disseminated to the public, in Palin they are confronted with someone who is willing and so far able to speak to the public directly with or without them.

    Sarah Palin has come under intense criticism for her resume from all corners of the Democratic Party establishment. She was the mayor of a small town, she attended five colleges none of them elite private institutions, and she doesn’t even have a graduate level degree.

    Sarah Palin is a working mom, mother of five, happily married to her high school sweetheart. Hers is a story of the every day, working class woman who has succeeded in everything she has done, and who has been rewarded with advancement after achieving her goals through determination and hard work. And Palin’s record as a public official is filled with accomplishment, bi-partisan success and even reform against the interests of her own party.

    The Democratic Party establishment is geared toward battling old, rich men who either come from well-connected families or who have long connections to those families and circles. Democrats are well-prepared to take on the likes of a John McCain, Mitt Romney, or George Bush, and have geared their operations for such opponents, including developing a well-defined message on how to defeat such politicians.

    Without the old playbook to go by, Democrats find themselves reduced to a Hillary Clintonesque kitchen sink strategy against Palin. Throw anything and everything against her. But this undisciplined approach has given them over to a highly emotional and in many cases utterly repulsive response that reeks of sexism and elitism. It has produced spasms of vile and hateful words, whose purpose is not so much to defeat a political rival, but to destroy a specific person.

    But for Republicans and for independent voters outside of the deeply blue enclaves or outside of the mindset of the deeply blue partisan, Sarah Palin doesn’t create such excitement because she is the answer to the “who do you want to have a beer with” question. She doesn’t stir deep emotions in voters because she is the one we have waited for who can understand our problems and feel our pain from a distance. Because no matter how much those things are attempts to make a politician someone we can relate to, and who we think can relate to us – it still keeps them at arms’ length and separate.

    Sarah Palin is not a person educated in the halls of Ivy League universities. She is not from a long line of political stock. She did not inherit the legacy of a powerful family. She was not mentored by politically connected professionals to be groomed for high government positions. She is not a politician who happens to be a mother and a wife – she is a mother and a wife who has set out through hard work and determination to ascend the political ladder to the position of governor and now as the vice presidential nominee in the Republican Party.

    Sarah Palin doesn’t own seven houses, and she doesn’t take her kids to school using a limousine. Her husband is a member of the local union, and her community organizing experience is that of PTA mom. Even the things that would make her exotic, like being a former beauty queen, reflect more popular culture than high society. And even though very few people can relate to the experience of killing a moose, the idea of a hunter and outdoorsman paint a picture of someone well grounded in the type of middle-American values most people can identify with. And while all of that provides the basis for the vituperation among the elite media and the Democratic Party establishment, it endears here to most everyone else in a way not usually seen in a politician.

    Sarah Palin is the politician who voters look at and say, “she is just like me”.

    And therein lies the new dynamic of the race for the next six weeks. Make no mistake, John McCain and Barack Obama are the presidential nominees. Behind the curtain of the voting booth, voters’ minds will focus on the choice between those two men.

    But now, with Sarah Palin having taken center stage in the election, as voters we will be forced to ask ourselves new questions leading up to the point of pulling that lever (or fingering the touch screen or punching chads, but I digress). Should the pinnacle of government be reserved only for the elite, highly-educated and well-connected and single-minded career politicians? Are such people better positioned and experienced to make the decisions of how the government should be run, to the exclusion of those like Sarah Palin, those who are “just like me”?

    Answers to these questions may well determine the outcome in this year’s presidential election.

    Something they have in common

    They seem so different. Male/female; black/white; liberal/conservative; big city/out in the boonies; Ivy League educated/small non-prestigous colleges (five of them for her undergraduate degree!).

    Apart from both breaking new ground in a presidential election (first African-American presidential nominee/first female nominee on a Republican ticket), is there anything they have in common?

    Maybe so...this is from a Field and Stream interview with Barack Obama:

    LICATA: Do you have a favourite piece of public land?

    SENATOR OBAMA: One of my best memories as a child was the first time I went to Yellowstone. You know, I was 11 years old, and I went with my grandmother and my mom and my sister, and we spent almost a week. And just driving along a road, and then suddenly coming across just a herd of elk wandering through, or seeing a moose peering out of the woods, out of the marshes: It was magic.


    See...Sarah Palin loves moose too!

    Well, shot, processed, and served in a bowl of stew, that is. But it's something.

    Oh and yeah, mmmmm, moose.

    Monday, September 15, 2008

    Sarah Aristoi

    This article by Steven Hayward in the Weekly Standard addresses an idea that has fascinated us ever since Sarah Palin was selected as John McCain’s running mate.

    We will just quote the beginning with the obligatory exhortation…

    Give 'em Hell, Sarah
    Like Truman, a natural-born executive.

    Lurking just below the surface of the second-guessing about Sarah Palin's fitness to be president is the serious question of whether we still believe in the American people's capacity for self-government, what we mean when we affirm that all American citizens are equal, and whether we tacitly believe there are distinct classes of citizens and that American government at the highest levels is an elite occupation.

    Read the whole thing!

    And for better or worse, we anticipate putting up a piece we are finishing that takes up the same basic idea but with a slightly different approach – free from all that intellectual rigor and application of historical examples … but with more snark! Perhaps you will see it sometime in the next several days.

    Tuesday, September 9, 2008

    Just who is Sarah Palin?

    Three points of data irrefutably put the lie to one of the strongest selling points of the Sarah Palin campaign (f/k/a the McCain campaign).

    First, Sarah Palin occupies the highest ranking public office in the largest state in the nation.

    Second, not only does Alaska possess the longest coastline in the country, its coastline is longer than all other states combined.

    Third, Sarah Palin has to travel over 2500 miles and even cross another freakin’ country just to get to Middle America.

    The only conclusion one can draw from this data is this:

    Sarah Palin is an out-of-touch coastal elite far removed from the Middle-America she and her supporters claims she represents.

    [VIMH: Surely you can’t be serious]
    First, I seldom am.

    Second, surely my "attack" on Palin can be taken as seriously as claims that she is like a Muslim fundamentalist with lipstick or a seductive, whip-wielding dominatrix (h/t Geraghty).

    Third, if anyone truly thinks that Sarah Palin is a religious extremist who is dependent upon her sex appeal to seduce voters or actually believes that characterizing her as such can sway independent voters, we’ve got a bridge (to nowhere) we’d like to offer them. In fact, there’s a chance they can get that bridge for pennies on the dollar, with the federal government chipping in for the rest … if we can just get Sarah Palin out of the governor’s mansion in Alaska and keep Joe Biden and Barack Obama in the Senate.

    McCain-Palin ‘08
    If you want another shot at the bridge to nowhere


    Monday, September 8, 2008

    Sarah Palin, Global Warming Crusader

    Much has been made of the moose hunting proclivities of Governor Sarah Palin, endearing her to many on the gun-loving right and causing her to be vilified by many on the left.

    And today, Mark Steyn offers this in the Corner:

    Moose blarney [Mark Steyn]

    Our pal Jay Nordlinger was on Irish radio yesterday, and several callers objected to Sarah Palin on the following grounds:

    The woman shoots moose, as did Teddy Roosevelt, a long time ago. Only in TR’s day, there were many more moose — Sarah endangers a species.

    Absolutely backwards, but an interesting example of how the progressive mind prefers to obsess on entirely fictional crises. There were far fewer moose in Teddy's day. ... We have a moose surplus.

    Ah, good point. And to be very explicit, a moose surplus is BAD.

    For the earth.

    Because moose cause global warming:

    The poor old Scandinavian moose is now being blamed for climate change, with researchers in Norway claiming that a grown moose can produce 2,100 kilos of carbon dioxide a year -- equivalent to the CO2 output resulting from a 13,000 kilometer car journey.

    Assuming that moose in Alaska emit as much greenhouse gas as moose in Norway (and let's face it, surely American moose are much less likely to be climate change conscious than their more enlightened European counterparts), then Sarah Palin is on the front lines of combating global warming by killing moose – assuming that she isn’t driving more than 8,000 miles to bag the moose.

    Sarah Palin, Saving The Earth One Kill At A Time.

    May your aim be true and your bag limits be reached.

    Saturday, September 6, 2008

    BREAKING NEWS: Oprah has PMS

    Oh, no, not that. Not that at all.

    We believe it was The Anchoress who came up with the new locution:

    Roger Kimball: From BDS to PDS, no, Sarah is a girl. She can’t give them PDS. She gives them PMS: Palin Madness Syndrome. In fact, that is what I think we should start calling the press: The PMS Media!

    Palin Madness Syndrome.

    There's a lot we don't yet know about this syndrome, but, unfortunately for America, PMS seems to be highly contagious:

    “The item in today’s Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over.” – Oprah Winfrey, September 5, 2008

    Now, to be honest, we don't believe that Oprah should be bullied into putting Palin on her show. It's her show, it's her choice. As long as Oprah realizes the cost it may have to her in viewership, she can make any decision she wants.

    And let's be honest. We think that Oprah will be strong enough to stand her ground and ignore Sarah Palin.

    Unlike Barack Obama.

    Odd, that. For Oprah, ignoring Sarah Palin is against her own self-interest, yet she by all appearances is willing and able to do so. For Obama, ignoring Sarah Palin is in his self interest, yet he by all appearances is either not willing or not able to do so.



    Reconnecting the disconnect

    So, maybe we're late to this -- but there is an awful disconnect with those on the left saying that Sarah Palin is a bad mother for accepting the VP nomination when she has five kids to take care of, including an infant with Down Syndrome.

    We distinctly remember these same people telling us endlessly that women could have it all -- that women shouldn't be held back by the notion that raising a family and having a career were mutually exclusive -- that a woman could do anything a man could do. And while we often recoil at the shrillness of the tone, in the end we have very little disagreement with the underlying sentiment.

    But where is this new disconnect now on display concerning Palin coming from?

    Where in the world would these people get the idea that being a mother and a career woman is so tough?

    I wake up every morning wondering how on earth I am going to pull off that next minor miracle to get through the day. I know that everybody in this room is going through this. That is the dilemma women face today. Every woman that I know, regardless of race, education, income, background, political affiliation, is struggling to keep her head above water. We try to convince ourselves that somehow doing it all is a badge of honor, but for many of us it is a necessity and we have to be very careful not to lose ourselves in the process. More often than not, we as women, are the primary caretakers in our households, scheduling babysitters, planning play dates, keeping up with regular doctor’s appointments; this was my week last week, supervising homework, handing our discipline. Usually we are the ones in charge of keeping the household together. I know you men, I know that you guys try to do your part, but the reality is that we’re doing it, right? (laughter and applause) Laundry, cleaning, cooking, shopping, home repairs. You know Barack has my back, he’s right there with me, feels my pain, and all that.

    Oh. Right.

    So, when we originally read those words from Michelle Obama, we wrote the following:

    If she thinks it's hard out there as the wife of a Senator and the wife of a Presidential candidate, just think of the demands of being first lady. And the strains of having your husband and your kids' father being President. If she thinks raising her family is hard now, if she thinks she can barely keep her head above water now, she in no way should think that she could make it with Barack in the White House. [...]

    For the love of God, won't somebody think of the children!

    Of course, we were kidding about Obama dropping out, it made for a good joke.

    But why are these Democrats, now oh so concerned with Sarah Palin's parenting, not concerned with Michelle?

    Sarah appears to go about the business of raising her family and having her career and being wildly successful in each.

    Michelle, in this campaign, has gone about the business of telling us its nearly impossible to have a family and a career.

    For the love of God, won't somebody think of Michelle!

    And more importantly, won't somebody think of anything other than scoring partisan points in the effort to win an election?

    Thursday, September 4, 2008

    Why press the issue

    Seriously. Surely the “she’s a good teleprompter reader” line is something some VRWC agent has somehow implanted into the subconscious of lefty Obamaphiles trying to belittle Palin’s speech.

    Because, just like the attacks on her experience, the discussion of teleprompters actually puts the issue in terms where Obama has some serious problems.

    So, we suppose we shouldn't be surprised to find some preemptive attacks, the subject of which apply to Obama.

    Rich Lowry on the Corner points us to this from Jonathan Alter of Newsweek:

    I'd imagine that Palin will dodge press conferences in favor of interviews with people like Sean Hannity, Larry King and Ellen DeGeneres. Then, when the media complain that she is being kept away, the McCain campaign will cite the half dozen or so interviews she has granted as proof that the campaign press is just bellyaching. Brief press "avails" on the plane will be useless, unless reporters ask open-ended queries designed to elicit proof of real knowledge.

    Well, let’s just get this out in the open:

    “Why can’t I just eat my waffle?”

    …and…

    “Come on, I already answered like eight questions.”

    …are defenses Sarah Palin will not use to avoid questions from the media.

    If Palin doesn’t want to talk to the press, she’ll just pull a gun on them.

    “Dance, press boy, dance”

    She knows what she's doing

    Catching up a little bit from our weekend, we are just now getting to James Taranto’s Best of the Web Today, from Monday. In it he writes:

    One prominent Democrat who has been very quite on the Palin choice is Hillary Clinton, who on Friday, according to CNN, put out a gracious statement:

    "We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin's historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain," Clinton, the first woman to win a presidential primary, said in the statement. "While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate."

    A lot of time and energy has been spent trying to divine whether the presence of Palin on the Republican ticket could pry Hillary supporters away from the Democrats.

    Fair enough. Go for it.

    But another interesting thought is that Palin offers Hillary a very plausible excuse to take a less active role in supporting Obama – she can make the point (privately) that she is not comfortable participating in attacking a woman candidate of either party. Girl Power! And yes, Hillary is happy with any excuse to sit this out without looking like she’s intentionally undermining Obama. She would love nothing more than for Obama to lose, clearing the way for her to challenge an incumbent McCain in 2012.

    So, sitting out helps undermine Obama’s campaign. But what Hillary really needs is to sabotage it. What could she do to sabotage the Obama campaign? Ahhh, back to Taranto:

    The New York Times reports that advisers to Mrs. Clinton will play a "greater role" in the Obama campaign as a result of the Palin pick

    [VIMH: Are you suggesting Hillary is sending in her advisers with instructions to sabotage Team Obama?]
    Oh, no, that's not it at all. After seeing how deftly her campaign managed to take what was to be her inevitable coronation and turn it into a thumping at the hands of the “former community organizer”, she has sent them in and told them to do everything they can to help Obama win.

    To achieve the opposite.



    MORE: Well, from Hot Air, we didn't like this NY Times headline "Obama Camp Turns to Clinton to Counter Palin", because it's kinda counter to our theory. But, why not actually read the thing...

    Advisers to Mrs. Clinton said that she stood ready to help the Obama-Biden ticket, but they urged the campaign not to overestimate the impact Mrs. Clinton could have, noting that she had other commitments this fall, like campaigning and raising money for Senate candidates.

    And rearranging her sock drawer.

    On Sarah Palin's speech

    We'll let others give the thorough reviews of Sarah Palin's speech. We'd put in a couple of links, but they'd just be to the same places as always anyways, and besides the swooning we are currently undergoing makes that kinda difficult right now.

    Our immediate reaction last night to the speech went like this...

    As objectively as I love it so, love her so, love the speech so, and no matter how much I would no matter anything else -- the thought that Sarah Palin delivered this speech under this pressure with this amount of sickening vitriol from the left, the media and the Dems has given me a respect for her that cannot be shaken.

    We feel the same this morning.

    Your move, Senator Obama. Think carefully about your response. Palin went after you hard last night, inviting a hard response.

    Because she wants it.

    You can stand up to a little ol’ small town mayor, can’t you?

    Wednesday, September 3, 2008

    Somebody has to say it

    Friday:

    DAYTON, Ohio - Republican John McCain introduced first-term Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate Friday, a stunning selection of a little-known conservative newcomer who relishes fighting the establishment.

    Yesterday:

    NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- U.S. crude futures for October delivery dropped $5.75 a barrel to settle $109.71. It was the lowest oil has settled since April 8, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    Today:

    Oil prices extended their decline Wednesday…

    Crude futures for October delivery were down $1.80 to $107.91 a barrel

    Correlation obviously does not necessarily mean causation, but you name a pro-drilling Alaska Governor to the Republican ticket and look what happens…

    Kidding.

    Oil traders banking on high oil prices to make a profit probably need not be terribly worried about Palin at this point. Not as worried as the caribou in ANWR should be, what with the prospect of facing the famed hunter with the power of the office of vice president in her possession, eager to exploit the oil rich area.

    Kidding.

    She won’t be culling herds of caribou in ANWR.

    Ah, but think about it … Cheney will be out of office in a few months.

    Kidding.

    Cheney typically gets his outdoor mojo on in Jackson Hole, WY (that is, unless he’s fishing with “naked ladies” in Idaho when he’s in a good mood or hunting quail in South Texas when he’s in a bad mood), so the Alaskan caribou are safe.

    But, perhaps Cheney should be worried – Palin does relish taking on big oil.

    Kidding.

    It’s Obama who should be worried, what with his big oil connections and actually facing her in the election.

    More on Palin

    We’ve talked before about the “who do you want to have a beer with” vote – and Sarah Palin may break the machine that would measure such things. Who wouldn’t want to have a beer with her – and we’re not just talking about her looks – she’s a bush pilot, a moose hunter, a commercial fisherwoman, she was raised by wolves and once killed a Kodiak bear with her bare hands.

    Those last two may prove apocryphal.

    Another thought - Sarah Palin introduces the “who would you want your child to grow up and marry” vote in a way that makes others pale by comparison. Again, not because of her physical attractiveness, but because of the way that she lives life to the fullest, loves those around her with vigor, and gets things done – she does all the big things in life right.

    Sure, there will be plenty of people who would want their children to grow up and marry Obama. But how many people would like to imagine their daughter belonging to, and then their grandkids being raised in Trinity United Church of Christ under the pastorship of Reverend Wright?

    Last thought – as easy as it was to predict that the left would overreact in vile and destructive ways toward Palin, here’s another easy prediction: the Left will misunderestimate Palin as a candidate. Count on it. Harder to predict is the actual success McCain-Palin will ultimately have at the ballot box – vice presidential candidates don’t decide election in and of themselves.


    But we wonder if the Left will be as successful at misunderestimating their way to defeat against McCain-Palin as they have been with George Bush in two elections.

    FIRST HINT: A pool on when Palin will drop out?