Monday, March 10, 2008

I Question the Timing (of Obama's forked tongue)

Dean Barnett shares a story on Obama from the Boston Globe, which includes this quote:

In July of 2004, the day after his speech at the Democratic convention catapulted him into the national spotlight, Barack Obama told a group of reporters in Boston that the United States had an "absolute obligation" to remain in Iraq long enough to make it a success.

"The failure of the Iraqi state would be a disaster," he said at a lunch sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, according to an audiotape of the session. "It would dishonor the 900-plus men and women who have already died. . . . It would be a betrayal of the promise that we made to the Iraqi people, and it would be hugely destabilizing from a national security perspective."

That was an audaciously hopeful thing for Obama to say.

Of course, some might question him now for saying, “I’ve been against [the war in Iraq] 2002, 2003, 2004, 5, 6, 7, 8.”

Audaciously cynical.

Somewhere along the line, he lost that hopefulness, that audaciousness. Strange that becoming the change the anti-war left has been waiting for coincided with the launch of his presidential campaign.

I Question the Timing!

Spitzer: A graphic depiction

MORE (posted at top): Hot Air has the story on "Kristen" (Ashley Alexandra Dupre) who, if she wants an "I did Eliot Spitzer t-shirt", can have one (or ten! or one hundred!) on the house. But if she gets anywhere near $100,000 for her story -- then we'll limit it to no more than ten.

eliotshirt

I did Eliot Spitzer
and all I got was
this lousy t-shirt...


UPDATE: New slogan?

Solicitation:
It's not just for campaign donations any more.

Sunday, March 9, 2008

Yes this is gratuitous (but that's never stopped me before!)

If I have one regret about waiting as long as I did before starting this blog, it is that by self-stifling my dissent and not speaking truth to power, I was giving up essential liberty for temporary security and deserved neither.

Oh, wait. That's not it.

My regret is that I didn't start this blog before John Edwards left the race. It coulda been fun!

I had some fun with Edwards at American Thinker.

But since I did the Michelle Obama book, I figured I would put up the one I did for Edwards when we found out about his work at Fortress, and his claim that he did it to learn about the relationship between making a fistful of dollars and poverty (I paraphrase, not an exact quote):




pillage

It Takes a Pillage
And Other Lessons Hedge Funds Teach Us

Yeah, it's old, it's gratuitous, but I'm not too concerned -- at the rate they're churning out pixels these days, I don't think we're going to run out any time soon

Don't forget the potluck tonight at 6

Good morning and welcome. Please take a minute, find someone near you and say hello.
...
Please open your hymnals and turn to page 352 as we begin this morning's worship. Let us stand and sing.
...

Barack of Ages, cleft for me,
Let me hide myself in Thee;
Let the change and let the hope,
From Thy blessed mouth which flowed,
Be my cynicism's cure;
Save my soul and make me pure.

While I live and while I breathe,
When mine eyes shall close in sleep,
When I soar to worlds unknown,
See Thee in Thy glorious hope,
Barack of Ages, cleft for me,
Let me hide myself in Thee.

Now please turn with me to page 294 as we continue to worship
...

My hope is built on nothing less
Than Obama's change and righteousness.
I dare not trust the sweetest frame,
But wholly lean on hope and change.
On heights of my Barack I stand,
All other ground is sinking sand.
All other ground is sinking sand

When He shall come with trumpet sound,
Oh may I then in Him be found.
Dressed in His change and in His hope,
Faultless to stand before the throne.
On heights of my Barack I stand,
All other ground is sinking sand.
All other ground is sinking sand.


You may be seated.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Obama speaks in just one tongue, but his is forked

Tom Maguire chronicles Obama's latest gyrations on Iraq.

Ever been to a tennis match, watching it from center court? You get the picture. You'd get video too, if I could find it on youtube. Instead, you get this.

From Political Radar, Obama said yesterday:

A war that should have never been authorized, a war that should have never been waged. I've been against it 2002, 2003, 2004, 5, 6, 7, 8. And I will bring this war to an end in 2009. So don't be confused.

I appreciate Obama trying to disabuse me of any confusion. It may be futile, however. Here is Obama in an interview on CBS:


And you pull out according to that time table, regardless of the situation? Even if there's serious sectarian violence?" CBS's Kroft asked.

"No, I always reserve as commander in chief, the right to assess the situation," Obama replied.

At least when Arafat would say one thing to one audience (Western leaders and media) and then another antipodean thing to another audience (the Palestinians), he would do so in different languages.

Obama, however, is not so burdened. He is the Mirror of Erised. He can say whatever he wants and people will believe he is saying whatever it is they want him to say.

Unless they're cynical.


UPDATE: I botched the ping pong (sorry, table tennis) link above ("you get this"), now fixed. Wait it out -- the overhead view makes it worth the wait!!!

I question Obama's patriotism

Samantha Power resigns from the Obama campaign.

She made the decision to resign after this remark about Hillary Clinton was published:
"She is a monster, too – that is off the record – she is stooping to
anything," Ms Power said, hastily trying to withdraw her remark.


Troubling!

I thought that Speaking Truth to Power was the second highest form of patriotism, behind, of course, Dissent.

Shame on you, Obama.

That level of Speaking Truth to Power patriotism deserved a promotion, if not a Medal of Honor.


[VIMH: What about the flag pin, the hand over his heart, his wife saying she hasn't been proud of her country until now?]
Well, I don't have the manual in front of me right now, but I'm pretty sure those are way down on the list of the highest forms of patriotism.

Friday, March 7, 2008

"The voice in my head is not who I am"

The above is a quote from A New Earth by Eckhart Tolle. Found on Oprah's book club.


[VIMH: The feeling's mutual, pal]

Indeed.


[VIMH: In fact, if I was who you are, I would have known you were in Oprah's book club]
I'm not in Oprah's book club.


[VIMH: Uh huh, sure you're not]
No, seriously. I was just Googling that phrase since it's the name of the blog.

[VIMH: You love Oprah, you love Oprah]
Oh come on.

[VIMH: Must hurt what with her endorsing Obama and all]
Now you're just being silly.

[VIMH: It's ok, I'm here for you]
Yeah, that's a bug, not a feature.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Do it in Denver! See you there!

Plan ahead for the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver


Be prepared

(Yes, you can find cheaper models. But let's face it - you'll want every one of these 50 watts)


Be very prepared


(A strong enameled ferrule is key)


Be very, very prepared

(I would prefer the more traditional model. But let's face it - a regulator really should be considered essential to help combat global warming)





Do it in Denver!



See you there!



UPDATE: Uh oh. Question is -- is the Recreate '68 website even accessible at DIA?

DENVER - Travelers using Denver International Airport's free Wi-Fi service cannot visit Internet sites that airport officials consider provocative.

A report in The Denver Post says the airport is blocking Vanity Fair magazine's Web site, the hipster site boingboing.net and others.

So, what would the proprietors of Recreate '68 want? People not to be able to get to their site at the airport where the convention will be held -- or not to be esteemed as provacative?

Tough call!

A voice of one calling in the desert

Everyone by now is becoming familiar with Michelle Obama's view of life in America...

To recap:

A modern day prophetess, she is a voice of one calling in the desert -- a desolate land of immense struggle we call America.

An America in which you don't live with the audacity of hope, you just try to muster...



michelle

The Audacity of Cope



UPDATE: WELCOME Mark Steyn readers! And thank you, Mr. Steyn. You have been very gracious, indeed! (If you would like a little story of Mr. Steyn’s graciousness, you can go here, keep scrolling!)

UPDATE: Don Surber finds that the Obamas live in John Edwards's America. He points to Jack Kelly who quotes Michelle as saying: “We spend between the two kids, on extracurriculars outside the classroom, we’re spending about $10,000 a year on piano and dance and sports supplements. And summer programs… Do you know what summer camp costs?”

I honestly have no idea how she copes. Only a five-figure budget for her kids' extracurricular activities? It's audacious.

(And thank you Mr. Surber for the link!)

Things are going to start happening to me now

The unyielding advance of modern technology continues to amaze. It’s been three years at our current address and just this month, we actually exist, according to Google.

With apologies to the original

A new Google Map is here! A new Google Map is here!

[VIMH: Boy, I wish I could get that excited about nothing.]

Nothing? Are you kidding? ::enters address:: Look! There’s my neighborhood, there’s my street, there’s my house! I'm somebody now! Millions of people look at this map everyday! This is the kind of spontaneous publicity - your name online - that makes people. I'm online! Things are going to start happening to me now.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

A wide open Democratic contest

Just when we thought we were about to see the Democratic race finally winnowed to the final candidate, Hillary makes her comeback in TX and OH. The Obama-Clinton slap fest unmercifully continues.

But it's worse than that. Much worse.

Barack Obama is often said to be relatively inexperienced in foreign policy for a Presidential candidate. Hillary Clinton especially likes to level this charge.

To fend off such attacks, Obama has formulated the now familiar response:

So there is a choice that has emerged in this campaign, one that the American people need to understand. They should ask themselves: who got the single most important foreign policy decision since the end of the Cold War right, and who got it wrong. This is not just a matter of debating the past. It's about who has the best judgment to make the critical decisions of the future.


So much for winnowing: Obama is opening the race up to roughly 55,887,820* additional candidates, as qualified by his standard of judgment.

Should make for one hell of a next Democratic debate, though.


[VIMH: You mean you want the Dem race to be over? You don’t want to see an all-out convention war?]
Shhhhhh. Of course I want to see that. But I’m trying to make a point here. It’s called building a Narrative.



UPDATE: [VIMH: Wait a second. Are you seriously saying that nearly 56 million people are as qualified as Obama to be President?]
Of course not. Why, I bet not even 10% of them are.

[VIMH: But that's like nearly 5.6 million people]
You're right. That might be a little low.





----------
*According to a Pew Research Center poll taken a couple of weeks after Obama’s anti-Iraq speech, 34% of American adults opposed the Iraq war at that time. We are assuming approximately 164,375,941 adults aged 30 or older in 2002, making them at least 35 today to meet the age requirement in the Constitution. Other Constitutional qualifications, such as John McCain’s mythically questionable natural born citizenship, remain unconsidered.

'Twas there that he parted in yon shady glen

Obama in December, takes the high road:


“Right now groups supporting Hillary Clinton and John Edwards are flooding Iowa and the other early states with millions of dollars in paid ads, phone calls, and mailings. Some of it is negative and even deceptive, and a lot of it is paid for by huge, unregulated contributions from special interests.” …


To give you a sense of the spending in Iowa right now, below is the most up-to-date independent expenditure information in Iowa. ...


For John Edwards
Working for Working Americans/Carpenters: $516,216.51
Alliance for a New America (SEIU): $760,801.00


Obama campaign now, takes the (Obama-described) low road:


For all its indignation, the Obama campaign doesn't mind playing it both ways when convenient. One example is the Senator's own easy relationship with spending on his behalf by organized labor. According to the Federal Election Commission, the Service Employees International Union was spending some $1.4 million to support his candidacy in Ohio and Texas, including direct mail, phone-banking and union outlays to pay for "volunteers." Meanwhile, the Fund For America, another so-called 527 group funded by George Soros and the SEIU, is funneling $400,000 to groups buying ads to attack John McCain.


I fear that Obama’s rhetoric and his actions will never meet again...on the bonnie, bonnie banks of Loch Lomond.


UPDATE: Oops, I missed the memo that it's Barack O'Bama. Huh, so he's Irish. My bad.


I call on Obama to bow out

[VIMH: What? Are you insane? Just because he lost OH and TX? He had won 12 in a row before last night -- and he's still won something like 13 of the last 16 contests.]

No. I mean Obama should bow out...for the children!

Here's wife Michelle on the campaign trail:


But seriously, with the exception of the campaign trail and life in the public eye, I have to say that my life now is not really that much different from many of yours. I wake up every morning wondering how on earth I am going to pull off that next minor miracle to get through the day. I know that everybody in this room is going through this. That is the dilemma women face today. Every woman that I know, regardless of race, education, income, background, political affiliation, is struggling to keep her head above water. We try to convince ourselves that somehow doing it all is a badge of honor, but for many of us it is a necessity and we have to be very careful not to lose ourselves in the process. More often than not, we as women, are the primary caretakers in our households, scheduling babysitters, planning play dates, keeping up with regular doctor’s appointments; this was my week last week, supervising homework, handing our discipline. Usually we are the ones in charge of keeping the household together. I know you men, I know that you guys try to do your part, but the reality is that we’re doing it, right? (laughter and applause) Laundry, cleaning, cooking, shopping, home repairs. You know Barack has my back, he’s right there with me, feels my pain, and all that. (laughter)



If she thinks it's hard out there as the wife of a Senator and the wife of a Presidential candidate, just think of the demands of being first lady. And the strains of having your husband and your kids' father being President. If she thinks raising her family is hard now, if she thinks she can barely keep her head above water now, she in no way should think that she could make it with Barack in the White House.

Besides, in Hillary's America, she will have a village to help raise her kids.

And if there one thing we've learned from her whining, it's that Michelle needs a village to raise her kids.

Yes, Michelle needs Hillary.

For the children.


For the love of God, won't somebody think of the children!


UPDATE: Of course this New Yorker profile comes out right when I put up this post. See Geraghty at Campaign Spot for all the good stuff.



MORE: Two Instalanches! The I told you so post is here. Thanks, Glenn.

Yesterday you were a voter

A new twist on an old joke.

A young man goes to register to vote. At the voter registration office he is told, "We do things differently now. You will be given the opportunity to attend the speech of each candidate for President. After hearing both candidates, then you will be allowed to choose the President."

Agreeing, the young man makes his way to the Barack Obama rally. The venue is a sold out basketball arena, the crowd is electric; beautiful people smiling, chanting, laughing, singing. Obama strides on stage. Listening to Obama, the young man begins thinking to himself:

Obama's finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don't even really inspire. They elevate. They enmesh you in a grander moment, as if history has stopped flowing passively by, and, just for an instant, contracted around you, made you aware of its presence, and your role in it. He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh, over color, over despair. The other great leaders I've heard guide us towards a better politics, but Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves, to the place where America exists as a glittering ideal, and where we, its honored inhabitants, seem capable of achieving it, and thus of sharing in its meaning and transcendence.

He leaves the speech, confident of where his vote will be placed, but ready to give John McCain a fair hearing. He arrives at the McCain venue -- many fewer people, not quite as electric, much less laughing and zero chanting. As McCain makes his way to the podium, the young man prepares himself for the speech. Listening to McCain, the young man begins thinking to himself:

The opening of the speech shows some humility ... No one's throwing vegetables in the room ... He's doing a very good job in delivering this speech ... A few boos... [He] sounds energized ... It's one of his better speeches, and he's hitting all the right notes for the crowd.

He later returns to the voter registration office. He is asked, “Now you must make your choice. Will it be Barack Obama or John McCain for President?”

Thinking back on both speeches, he considers McCain’s speech as impressive for its substance. But then, considering Obama’s speech, he remembers how it made him feel.

The young man answers, “Barack Obama”.

The next day, as he awakes, there is a knock at the door. A man in a dark suit simply says, “I’m from the government and I need to see your wallet,” and then proceeds to take all of the young man’s money.

Bewildered, the young man heads back down to the voter registration office and asks to see the manager. The manager appears from the back of the office and politely inquires, “How can I help you?”

The young man replies, “I don’t understand. Yesterday, listening to Obama I heard a speech of hope and change and unity. And yet today, the government took all of my money. What is going on?”

“It’s quite simple,” the manager answered calmly. “Yesterday you were a voter and today you are a constituent.”



UPDATE: Original joke here. Tom Maguire says the WaPo may have likened Obama to Hitler. It occurs to me I may have outdone them with this joke. Yikes!

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Hillary and the doctrine of planning pre-emptive squandering

Via Michael Goldfarb at the Worldwide Standard, we find this NY Sun article, quoting retired general and “co-author of the surge”, Jack Keane:

"I have no doubts whatsoever that if she were president in January '09 she would not act irresponsibly and issue orders to conduct an immediate withdrawal from Iraq, regardless of the consequences, and squander the gains that have been made."


And the Clinton campaign’s response? A nearly Obama-esque, “Yes we can will!”

The senator's campaign differed with that assessment. "Senator Clinton speaks for herself on her plans to end the Iraq war," the campaign's communication director, Howard Wolfson, said Sunday. "She has said she will end the war the right way, swiftly and responsibly, and beginning within 60 days of taking office."


And Clinton has a plan to begin squandering right now…

Indeed, Mrs. Clinton's Web site features her plan to "begin ending this war — not next year, not next month — but today."

...if not for those silly things called elections.

Though General Keane’s wording is a bit rough, with the double-negative “I have no doubts…she would not act…” perhaps there is an opportunity for an Obama-esque slogan the Clinton campaign could use here.

Hillary Clinton: Doubt You Can Believe In


UPDATE: Well, this article is making the rounds.


BAGHDAD — After almost five years of war, many young people in Iraq, exhausted by constant firsthand exposure to the violence of religious extremism, say they have grown disillusioned with religious leaders and skeptical of the faith that they preach.


Aha! Thus is the Hillary (and Democrats) strategy is made clear.


The old Democratic line on Iraq: “By killing terrorists, we’ll only make more terrorists.”


The new Democrat line on Iraq: “By leaving Iraq and letting al Qaeda kill more innocents, we’ll make more people who turn away from militant Islamism.”


Monday, March 3, 2008

Ready on day one, ready in six rings

On Campaign Spot, Jim Geraghty wonders about that “3 a.m.” ad by Hillary:

I can't help but notice that in the ad, no one actually picks up the phone until the end. (In the Hillary Administration, the crisis hotline will ring six times before Hillary answers, I guess.)

Well, what that commercial has given us is a means of determining how much time it takes Hillary to get out of bed, fix her hair, put on makeup, a fabulous pant suit, and jewelry.

Six rings.

That’s actually quite impressive. Score one point for Hillary.

[VIMH: That coming from someone who didn't shave from Thursday until today?]
Good point. But you're not going to bait me into speculation on the amount of gray Hillary's beard would have were she to grow one.

Time for a Hillary Sister Soulja moment?

Hillary could be audacious here. McCain's status as American war hero is not something a rival campaign should mess with. Not to mention George Washington and Jack Kennedy:

Steinem raised McCain’s Vietnam imprisonment as she sought to highlight an alleged gender-based media bias against Clinton.

“Suppose John McCain had been Joan McCain and Joan McCain had got captured, shot down and been a POW for eight years. [The media would ask], ‘What did you do wrong to get captured? What terrible things did you do while you were there as a captive for eight years?’” Steinem said, to laughter from the audience.

McCain was, in fact, a prisoner of war for around five-and-a-half years, during which time he was tortured repeatedly. Referring to his time in captivity, Steinem said with bewilderment, “I mean, hello? This is supposed to be a qualification to be president? I don’t think so.”

Steinem’s broader argument was that the media and the political world are too admiring of militarism in all its guises. “I am so grateful that she [Clinton] hasn’t been trained to kill anybody. And she probably didn’t even play war games as a kid. It’s a great relief from Bush in his jump suit and from Kerry saluting.”

To the Observer, Steinem insisted that “from George Washington to Jack Kennedy and PT-109 we have behaved as if killing people is a qualification for ruling people.”

Hillary could dress up her denunciation with tears for effect.

Shades of gray

You know you're getting older when you go to shave on a Monday morning after not shaving since Thursday and you realize, "If I ever want to grow a beard again, I'm gonna have to get some Just For Men."

[VIMH: Why in the world would you be considering growing a beard?]
Two words: Bill Richardson

[VIMH: Seems to me if you wanted to look like Bill Richardson, you'd have to put on about a hundred pounds]
Well at least I got that going for me.

Sunday, March 2, 2008

The talk of change that's no more than just rhetoric

Obama on the campaign trail:

That's the kind of change that's more than just rhetoric - that's change you can believe in.

It's change that won't just come from more anger at Washington or turning up the heat on Republicans. There's no shortage of anger and bluster and bitter partisanship out there. We don't need more heat. We need more light. I've learned in my life that you can stand firm in your principles while still reaching out to those who might not always agree with you.


Obama campaign on the warpath:

At 5:30 p.m. Saturday, Politico’s story about Barack Obama’s problems winning Catholic voters went live.

Within minutes, editor
Charlie Mahtesian’s phone started ringing.

The heated interaction beween
Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign and Politico's national political editor Saturday afternoon and evening was in many ways routine. But it was also a window into aspects of the political process outsiders do not usually see or understand.

The exchanges show the speed and ferocity with which operatives inside presidential campaigns argue even the slightest nuances of stories they believe could be damaging. They also show the hectic, on-the-fly judgments that journalists make as they try to abide by standards of fairness while pushing back against dubious spin.

Among a volley of staff members and surrogates for Obama’s campaign to call Mahtesian, the most combative was deputy communications director Dan Pfeiffer.

Mahtesian, who has written about national politics for nearly two decades, said Sunday he was taken aback by Pfeiffer’s bellicose tone.

"Who are you? I've never heard of you. What's your background?" Pfeiffer
demanded to know, Mahtesian recalled. ...

But campaign reporters with Politico and other publications tell me the response was characteristic of an Obama press operation that is becoming known, as is its counterpart in the Clinton campaign, for an aggressive style.

Listen, the heated interaction was routine. The author of this Politico article states that plainly. The Obama campaign isn't acting any differently than any other campaign.

Nothing to see here, right?

Exactly. Just like every other cynical politician, Obama's talk of change is no more than just rhetoric.



UPDATE: Via Redstate we have more and direct evidence of Obama on the warpath:


It's not quite eight in the morning and Barack Obama is on the phone screaming at me. He liked the story I wrote about him a couple weeks ago, but not this garbage.

Months earlier, a reporter friend told me she overheard Obama call me an asshole at a political fund-raiser. Now here he is blasting me from hundreds of miles away for a story that just went online but hasn't yet hit local newsstands.

It's the first time I ever heard him yell, and I'm trembling as I set down the phone. I sit frozen at my desk for several minutes, stunned.

Saturday, March 1, 2008

That was then, this is now

Obama on the pre-campaign trail in 2006:

I think what people might point to is our different assessments of the war in Iraq, although I’m always careful to say that I wasnot in the Senate, so perhaps the reason I thought it was such a bad idea was that I didn’t have the benefit of U.S. intelligence. And, for those who did, it might have led to a different set of choices. So that might be something that sort of is obvious. But, again, we were in different circumstances at that time: I was running for the U.S. Senate, she had to take a vote, and casting votes is always a difficult test. (h/t Syl)

Obama on the campaign trail today:

"Real change isn't voting for George Bush's war in Iraq and then telling the American people it was actually a vote for more diplomacy when you start running for president," Obama said. "The title of the bill was 'A Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.'

Obama sure was magnanimous as the insurgent candidate of hope back in 2006. As the frontrunner candidate of hope, he seems so much more, what's the word...oh, yes...cynicial.