Thursday, May 15, 2008

Narratives (And the Narrating Narrators That Narrate Them)

First: McCain, Obama and Hamas

When Hamas official Ahmed Yousef says this…

We don’t mind–actually we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance,” Yousef said in response to a question about the group’s willingness to meet with either of the Democratic presidential candidates.

...and John McCain says this...

“I think it is very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States..."

...Obama says this:

"This is offensive and I think it's disappointing, because John McCain always says, well, I'm not going to run that kind of politics and that engages in that kind of smear I think is unfortunate, particularly since my policy toward Hamas has been no different than his.

And after all that, CNN says this:

Those doubts were earlier stoked by Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee in the 2008 presidential election, when he recently charged that Obama is the favored candidate of the Islamic fundamentalist group Hamas, which the U.S. government has listed as a terrorist group.

Obama last week called the Hamas allegation a "smear" and lashed out Thursday at Bush's speech in Israel.

Right. McCain “charged...the Hamas allegation”. The words used imply that McCain is making an unsupported accusation.

Well, at any rate, if at some point the media accidentally stumbles upon the Yousef quote, we will likely then see a new approach:

John McCain is echoing Hamas propaganda!

Second: Bush, Obama and Appeasement

When Bush says this...

Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: “Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.” We have an obligation to call this what it is – the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.

…Obama says this…

It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack," Obama said in a statement released to CNN by his campaign. "It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel…."

"George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel," Obama's statement said.

…WH spokesbabe Dana Perino says this…

The White House said Bush's comment wasn't a reference to Obama.

"It is not," press secretary Dana Perino told reporters in Israel. "I would think that all of you who cover these issues and have for a long time have known that there are many who have suggested these types of negotiations with people that the president, President Bush, thinks that we should not talk to. I understand when you're running for office you sometimes think the world revolves around you. That is not always true. And it is not true in this case."

So naturally, the NY Times led with this...

“President Bush used a speech to the Israeli Parliament on Thursday to issue a veiled rebuke to Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential contender, who has argued that the United States should negotiate with countries like Iran and Syria.”

It’s ok, NY Times -- I understand when your personal messiah and savior is running for office you sometimes think the world revolves around him.

Same as it ever was.

MORE: We note that the NY Times has since amended it to this:

President Bush used a speech to the Israeli Parliament on Thursday to denounce those who would negotiate with “terrorists and radicals” — a remark that was widely interpreted as a rebuke to Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential contender, who has argued that the United States should talk directly with countries like Iran and Syria.

2 comments:

  1. Is Obama suggesting that Iran and Syria are “terrorists and radicals” ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. .
    The terrorist monkey can not be negotiated with. The only reason to maybe talk to Ahmadamadmonkey in say maybe Switzerland is to provoke him by debating his ideology and criticizing his hatred. Force him to say lots of stupid and insane things which would be widely publicized thus educating more people to his ideology's insanity. This, I am quite sure, Obama would never do.

    Ouch, Obama and the poor little Dems were hit a little too close to home by what GW said. It's one of the best things Bush has ever said. Bravo! And he didn't even have to mention the Dhimmicrats or any body's name.

    So sure, then he folded in Saudi Arabia, but what he said in Israel almost makes that OK.
    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    appease the appeasers

    don't embarrass them
    by calling them appeasers

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe said
    have a sit down with Hitler

    he should have been sweet-talked
    he had goodness within

    .
    Appeasement Talk Bothers Appeasers

    Help Halt Terrorism Now!

    USpace

    :)
    .

    ReplyDelete